| 137 | == Notes == |
| 138 | |
| 139 | The NCBI don't (yet) provide their data in RDF format, but they do provide a lot of different URLs for their resources (in various formats), some of which follow the pattern above: |
| 140 | |
| 141 | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy/9606 |
| 142 | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/15275 |
| 143 | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18472304 |
| 144 | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/2755819 (this redirects) |
| 145 | |
| 146 | However, it is unclear if this pattern covers all their databases or if they regard these as URLs they intend to support long term. Moreover, these URLs currently give HTML (although in the long term the NCBI could return RDF by content negotiation?). Could we or ''should'' we use these NCBI URLs as URIs right now? |
| 147 | |
| 148 | For publications with a DOI, do these URLs also make good URIs? The all redirect to the journal websites which tend to give you an HTML page: |
| 149 | |
| 150 | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.03.004 |
| 151 | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-S10-S11 |
| 152 | |
| 153 | Peter |