Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Data_exchange
- Timestamp:
- 2010/02/12 16:54:42 (15 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Data_exchange
v2 v3 19 19 20 20 '''Discussion on possibilities/need for improving data exchange between 21 e.g. InterMine, Galaxy,BioMart, Cytoscape...'''21 e.g. !InterMine, Galaxy, !BioMart, Cytoscape...''' 22 22 23 23 Would typing of arbitrary data exchange improve communication between … … 41 41 needed> 42 42 43 Cytoscape (http://www.cytoscape.org) & BioMart: REST API used. Perhaps SOAP would be better but43 Cytoscape (http://www.cytoscape.org) & !BioMart: REST API used. Perhaps SOAP would be better but 44 44 this still requires some development. REST was fine for data 45 45 retrieval. 46 46 47 BioMart: the Mart deployer decides on the meta-data layer in47 !BioMart: the Mart deployer decides on the meta-data layer in 48 48 biomart - the GUI uses this layer rather than the data. It assumes 49 49 that the user understands what you are talking about. Sometimes … … 54 54 55 55 Interoperation of Marts: this is the only place where must get the 56 semantics correct. If one mart calls something a UniProt56 semantics correct. If one mart calls something a !UniProt 57 57 identifier and the other one does too then essential that they are 58 58 refering to the same identifier. Perhaps would be good to have … … 60 60 have matching values. 61 61 62 InterMine (http://www.intermine.org): multiple organisms can use the same identifiers63 e.g. across 12 drosophila genomes. InterMines can ask each other62 !InterMine (http://www.intermine.org): multiple organisms can use the same identifiers 63 e.g. across 12 drosophila genomes. !InterMines can ask each other 64 64 what data they provide but can't be sure name-spaces are 65 compatible. Would be nice if InterMine orBioMart systems can talk65 compatible. Would be nice if !InterMine or !BioMart systems can talk 66 66 and discover what they have and how they could communicate. Agreed 67 67 that would be good to have more formal description so that intended 68 InterMine talking toBioMart backend could be easier.68 !InterMine talking to !BioMart backend could be easier. 69 69 70 70 … … 104 104 File formats vs labelling of data itself: 105 105 106 BioMart/InterMine can both provide column meaning "GO identifier",106 !BioMart/ !InterMine can both provide column meaning "GO identifier", 107 107 but where to assert they are the same thing? 108 108 … … 110 110 111 111 Is there a need for a central naming authority/ namespace provider? 112 Given work on UniProt already, is EBI an natural location for this?112 Given work on !UniProt already, is EBI an natural location for this? 113 113 DDBJ/ DBCLS/ NCBI? 114 114 … … 157 157 arbitrary human-friendly names are also good. 158 158 159 * Agreed to dump all BioMart/InterMine column headings out, find159 * Agreed to dump all !BioMart/ !InterMine column headings out, find 160 160 the common/commonly-used ones and work on naming. 161 161 … … 167 167 the same versions of genomes. Agreed Versioning is important. 168 168 169 BioMart/ UCSC do have versions169 !BioMart/ UCSC do have versions 170 170 available but not necessarily using the same namespaces. 171 171