= UseCases = == Participants == (Please add your name!) * Kazuharu Arakawa * Mark Wilkinson * Francois Belleau * Arek Kasprzyk * Paul Gordon * Yasunori Yamamoto * Akira R. KINJO * Gos Micklem == Summary == Lots of use cases in data and service integrations are available in websites such as [http://www.myexperiment.org/ myExperiment] and [http://www.flymine.org/ FlyMine]. Using semantic web, any of the existing questions and use cases can be more efficient. So one use case/demonstration would be to compare how data can be published with existing & SW technology. * questions that queries over separated DBs * using in-house data -> NGS * can be in different sources - less cost of integration * querying the predicates * discovery of DBs * hypothesis generation * interpreted knowledge * not numerical? * not too raw? * linked by predicates (even if numerical) * data are linked * migrate SQL to simple SPARQL endpoints * easy to convert 20 lines? * convert PDB relational to Sparql (kinjo-san, Fransois) * miRbase (raoul) * users do not have to know the entire schema * Paul * predict PPI using homologs (PPI in yeast -> homolog in human) * formulation of SPARQL queries -> RDFscape * can be GUI.